Jarkko Nieminen vs Roberto Bautista Agut Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L L W W W
Form
L L L W L W L L W LH2H: Nieminen 1 - 1 Agut
They have played 6 sets in total, with Nieminen winning 3 and Agut winning 3. The last match between Nieminen and Agut was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 11-03-2014, Third, Hard with Roberto Bautista Agut getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | 1 |
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(11-03-2014)
6
2
4
6
7
6
| Nieminen | Stats | Agut |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (4-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 55 |
| 13 | Highest Rank | 9 |
| 43 | Age | 37 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 25 |
| 58% (574-409) | Career Total W/L | 61% (728-462) |
| $3,231,200 | Career Prize Money | $12,978,850 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
81 of
113)
1st Serve %
78%
(
93 of
119)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
50 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 31 | Games Won | 31 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:21:18 | Average Match Time | 2:21:18 |
| 71% (145/205) | 1st Serve % | 72% (157/219) |
| 61% (88/145) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (94/157) |
| 53% (32/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (33/62) |
| 43% (9/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 42% (92/219) | Return Points Win % | 41% (85/205) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Bautista Agut Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
55%
(
62 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
45%
(
51 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
23
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
91
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (574/409) | Win/Loss | 61% (728/462) |
| 56% (1408/1109) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (1745/1202) |
| 52% (12634/11470) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (15150/13197) |
| 52% (158/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (291/164) |
| 63% (202/120) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (246/182) |
| 62% (187/114) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (135/88) |
| 46% (27/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (56/28) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1850 | Aces Total | 2729 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1180 | Total Double Faults | 1745 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:20:12 |
| 524.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 443.29 |
| 66% (29581/44936) | 1st Serve % | 66% (45560/69150) |
| 68% (20221/29561) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (31679/45560) |
| 50% (7706/15364) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (12661/23585) |
| 42% (1744/4112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2795/6729) |
| 38% (16915/44087) | Return Points Win % | 39% (27605/70070) |
| 53% (59/53) | Slam W/L | 63% (92/55) |
| 47% (75/85) | Masters W/L | 54% (108/93) |
| 81% (42/10) | Cups W/L | 72% (26/10) |
| 56% (270/211) | Main Tour W/L | 62% (249/152) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (126/47) | Challenger W/L | 59% (95/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 64% (155/86) |
| 58% (475/820) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (638/1043) |
| 60% (93/155) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (83/137) |
| 54% (198/364) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (238/438) |
| 56% (185/330) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (198/375) |
| 84% (559/472) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (709/612) |
| 15% (559/86) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (709/96) |
| 23% (424/99) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (481/115) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
